Trump Makes English the Only Official Language of the US, Revokes Clinton Language Access Order

A new Executive Order published on March 1, 2025, by the US White House designates English as the only official language of the United States and revokes Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency” (LEP), signed in 2000 during the Clinton administration.

Trump Makes English the Only Official Language of the US, Revokes Clinton Language Access Order

The new order states that it is in the country’s best interest for the federal government to designate only one official language. It also argues that “Establishing English as the official language will not only streamline communication but also reinforce shared national values, and create a more cohesive and efficient society.”

The order also specifies that agency heads, defined as “the highest-ranking official of an agency,” are “not required to amend, remove, or otherwise stop production of documents, products, or other services prepared or offered in languages other than English.”

While the text states that this Executive Order does not create new legal rights or benefits, and that it should be implemented subject to existing laws, the Trump administration has instructed the Attorney General to update policy guidance in line with the new official language designation.

A Shift in Language Access Policy?

Revoked order 13166 required federal agencies to examine their services and identify language assistance needs for LEP populations, mandating the development and implementation of systems to meet those needs.

Language access guidelines under 13166 aligned with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of multiple criteria, including national origin (and by association, language). It expressly mandated recipients of federal financial assistance, such as healthcare providers and educational institutions, to offer language assistance to LEP applicants and beneficiaries.

In 2003, during George W. Bush’s administration, the LEP.gov website was launched to help federal agencies, advocates, and individuals access related information and services. And for a couple of decades, including during the previous Trump term (2017–2021), the US Department of Justice (DOJ) provided policy guidance to assist federal agencies for compliance.

Still standing, and not mentioned in the latest Executive Order, is the one formulated during the Biden administration: Executive Order 14091 (2023), “Further Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.”

Executive Order 14091 instructs agencies to consider opportunities to “improve accessibility for people with disabilities and improve language access services to ensure that all communities can engage with agencies’ respective civil rights offices.”

At the time of writing, both the LEP.gov site and the US Commission on Civil Rights’ Limited English Proficiency Plan remain online.

Researchers Present DOLFIN, a New Test Set for AI Translation for Financial Content

On February 5, 2025, a team of researchers from Grenoble Alpes University and Lingua Custodia, a France-based company specializing in AI and natural language processing (NLP) for the finance sector, introduced DOLFIN, a new test set designed to evaluate document-level machine translation (MT) in the financial domain.

The researchers say that the financial domain presents unique challenges for MT due to its reliance on precise terminology and strict formatting rules. They describe it as “an interesting use-case for MT” since key terms often shift meaning depending on context.

For example, the French word couverture means blanket in a general setting but hedge in financial texts. Such nuances are difficult to capture without larger translation units.

Despite strong research interest in document-level MT, specialized test sets remain scarce, the researchers note. Most datasets focus on general topics rather than domains such as legal and financial translation.

Given that many financial documents “contain an explicit definition of terms used for the mentioned entities that must be respected throughout the document,” they argue that document-level evaluation is essential. 

DOLFIN allows researchers to assess how well MT models translate longer texts while maintaining context. 

Unlike traditional test sets that rely on sentence-level alignment, DOLFIN structures data into aligned sections, enabling the evaluation of broader linguistic challenges, such as information reorganization, terminology consistency, and formatting accuracy.

Context-Sensitive

To build the dataset, they sourced parallel documents from Fundinfo, a provider of investment fund data, and extracted and aligned financial sections rather than individual sentences. The dataset covers English-French, English-German, English-Spanish, English-Italian, and French-Spanish, with an average of 1,950 segments per language pair. 

The goal, according to the researchers, was to develop “a test set rich in context-sensitive phenomena to challenge MT models.”

To assess the usefulness of DOLFIN, the researchers evaluated large language models (LLMs) including GPT-4o, Llama-3-70b, and their smaller counterparts. They tested these models in two settings: translating sentence by sentence versus translating full document sections. 

They found that DOLFIN effectively distinguishes between context-aware and context-agnostic models, while also exposing model weaknesses in financial translation.

Larger models benefited from more context, producing more accurate and consistent translations, while smaller models often struggled. “For some segments, the generation enters a downhill, and with every token, the model’s predictions get worse,” the researchers observed, describing how smaller LLMs failed to maintain coherence over longer passages.

DOLFIN also reveals persistent weaknesses in financial MT, particularly in formatting and terminology consistency. Many models failed to properly localize currency formats, defaulting to English-style notation instead of adapting to European conventions.

The dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face.

Authors: Mariam Nakhlé, Marco Dinarelli, Raheel Qader, Emmanuelle Esperança-Rodier, and Hervé Blanchon

Off-Screen Drama Pits AI Dubbing Against French Voice Actors

How do US actor Sylvester Stallone, France’s minister for gender equality Aurore Bergé, and a multilingual/multibillion voice AI company collide in a tense drama? Since early January 2024, multiple online media sources have highlighted a clash that began with news that “Armor,” a film starring Stallone, would feature AI dubbing.

For 50 years, Alain Dorval was the familiar voice of Stallone in French-dubbed films, but he passed away in February 2024. Minister Bergé happens to be Dorval’s daughter. Enter ElevenLabs, which in January 2024 reached a USD 3bn valuation, and found itself at the center of a weeks-long controversy over the cloning of Dorval’s voice.

Bergé publicly opposed (article in French) the use of her father’s digitally recreated voice, despite acknowledging a prior agreement to a test. “It was just a trial run, with an agreement strictly guaranteeing that my mother and I would have final approval before any use or publication. And that nothing could be done without our consent.”

According to Variety, which has followed the story since the partnership around “Armor” between Lumiere Ventures and ElevenLabs came to light, Bergé’s move galvanized the French actors’ guild (FIA, in French). 

FIA’s representative, Jimmy Shuman, called the voice cloning attempt a “provocation” in the Variety article. That is because the union is in the midst of “negotiating agreements on limits for artificial intelligence and dubbing.”

The controversy over Stallone’s French voice underscores the potential for AI to displace voice actors, often celebrities in their own right across Europe.

ElevenLabs CEO, Mati Staniszewski, told Variety that “Recreating Alain Dorval’s voice is a chance to show how technology can honor tradition while creating new possibilities in film production.” 

Like their US counterparts after a few notable actions, voice-over artists in several European countries are taking a proactive stance through their unions, including AI clauses in their contracts to restrict AI voice use to specific projects or outright banning work for studios that do not offer adequate protections.

Per the latest Variety article on the subject, voice actor Michel Vigné will be the voice of Stallone for the French release. According to IMDB, Vigné has already voiced Stallone in French in the past.

The larger issue remains: the film industry acknowledges that AI voice cloning technology is rapidly advancing and the drama around Armor’s French dubs serves as a symbol of things to come in Europe and beyond.

One decision that perhaps many voice actors will need to grapple with is whether they want their voice to be immortalized with AI or simply be replaced by it or by another actor.

Why Interpreting Remains a Growth Market with Boostlingo CEO Bryan Forrester

Bryan Forrester, Co-founder and CEO of Boostlingo, returns to SlatorPod for round 2 to talk about the company’s growth, the US interpreting market, and the evolving role of AI.

Bryan shares how the company has tripled in size since he last appeared on the pod, driven by strategic acquisitions, including VoiceBoxer and Interpreter Intelligence, and a rebranding effort to unify its product portfolio.

Bryan explains how Boostlingo balances innovation with practicality, ensuring that new features align with customer needs. He highlights the company’s three-pronged strategy: retaining existing customers, enabling growth, and making long-term bets on emerging trends.

While tools like real-time captions and transcription enhance efficiency, Bryan stresses that AI alone cannot replace human interpreters in complex industries like healthcare. He highlights privacy, compliance, and the nuanced expertise of human interpreters as critical factors, positioning AI as a supportive tool rather than a replacement.

https://youtu.be/fMNcJ5EV2zk

Bryan discusses market dynamics and regulatory changes, including how those under the new US administration could influence language access demand, particularly in areas like healthcare and public services. 

He describes Boostlingo’s strategy of leveraging third-party AI models, optimizing them with proprietary data, and rigorously testing to ensure quality and reliability. Looking ahead, Boostlingo plans to expand internationally and integrate AI ethically and effectively into its offerings, guided by its newly formed AI Advisory Board. 

AI in Interpreting: Slator Pro Guide

Slator's Pro Guide: AI in Interpreting is an absolute must-read for all providers of interpreting services and solutions. Here, the authors give a quick snapshot of what the newest applications of AI and large language models (LLMs) look like in interpreting.

This Slator Pro Guide will bring you up to speed on what value AI can bring to your company and the new interpreting workflows, service models, and speech AI capabilities now available to you.

The guide covers 10 one-page, actionable case studies-thematically designed and presented as vibrant infographics drawn from research and interviews with some of the leading interpreting service providers in the industry.

The ten use cases highlight new areas of growth, innovative models for service delivery, and novel workflows in interpretation made possible by the recent developments in LLMs, speech-to-text, and speech synthesis.

We will illustrate how AI speech translation solutions are being leveraged to open up language access across corporate, government, and healthcare settings, cutting across a wide variety of settings and service delivery models.

The guide also discusses AI as an interpreter tool and co-pilot, as well as its capability to optimize operations and extract insights from interpreted interactions.

Each use case describes the underlying concept and practical implications. An adoption and value-add score is also provided to reflect the industry's current level of uptake for the application as well as the additional value that it delivers to end clients.

We explain how the technology works and offer a brief list of leading AI solution providers currently on the market.

We expand on the new opportunities and benefits that each use case presents for interpreting stakeholders and carry out an impact analysis for the interpreting sector.

We also identify key risks and limitations to watch out for, which need to be considered in the adoption process.

The guide provides a higher-level overview of the key and impactful applications that can serve as a launching pad for stakeholders to make strategic decisions about adopting AI in interpreting technology and service models.

This Pro Guide is a must-read and time-saving briefing on how AI is revolutionizing the interpretation landscape.

LinkedIn Ranks 'Interpreter' Among Fastest-Growing Jobs in the UK

On 7 January 2025, LinkedIn News UK released its "Job trends 2025: The 25 fastest-growing jobs in the UK", and the interpreters find themselves at #22. LinkedIn calls this "Jobs on the Rise" - positions that it considers to be pointers of areas of career opportunity based on data collected over the past three years.

In the list, it names both spoken and sign language interpreters and states the skills typical for a professional in the field as: interpreting, translation, and consecutive interpretation. The professionals are thus mainly in demand in translation and localization, museums, historical sites, zoos, and interestingly enough, transportation equipment manufacturing.

The LinkedIn data points to London, Manchester, and Glasgow as the top UK locations where the hiring of interpreters is taking place. The average experience required is 2.2 years, while most interpreters work remotely at 73%, or in a hybrid position at 8%. The rest is assumed to work on-site; however, the figure is not included in this list.

Most interpreters in the UK and other countries work as public service interpreters, with a minority working as conference interpreters. Public service interpreters work at public institutions, such as the National Health Service (NHS), the Courts and Tribunals System, and Border Force and Immigration Enforcement.

Interpreting is one of the UK government's regulated professions. "Interpreter" is included in the government list under "Chartered Linguist," which is a general term for various professions related to languages recognized by the bodies that subscribe to the standards of the Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL), such as the National Register of Public Service Interpreters (NRPSI).

Contrast to the upbeat LinkedIn ranking of interpreting as an area of opportunity is the at times contentious environment in the UK's public service interpreting sector, especially over the past two years. In that time frame, for instance, the NRPSI has sent multiple official communications to the Ministry of Justice regarding its policies as interpreters continue to protest work conditions and pay schedules in several cities.

Slator has also covered the development of UK public services interpreting over the same period in several articles, such as the review of court interpreter qualifications, new credentials, legal probes into current contracts and future tenders, who pays for interpreter services, and discussions on the use of Al or lack thereof during government sessions.

US Government RFP Seeks Translation Into Four Native American Languages

The United States government has issued an unusual RFP for translation services: The target languages are all indigenous to the US.

The contracting agency is the Office of Indian Economic Development (OIED), which falls under the Bureau of Indian Affairs that governs programs concerning federally recognized American Indian Tribes. OIED has allied with the Department of Agriculture, or USDA, in this contract. This will provide a means whereby diverse agencies can request translation into Native languages.

The RFP features a set-aside for Indian Small Business Economic Enterprises, meaning that only companies meeting certain revenue and ownership requirements may apply. OIED would prefer to award a single contractor work for all four languages.

"This is a one-year project that will respond to federal agency requests for ongoing and diverse Native Language translation that will be specific to the federal agency needs," the RFP states, noting the contract may be extended more than once, but only for an additional period of up to six months. Work covered under the contract is between January 20, 2025 – January 19, 2026.

The ultimate goal is to make available the range of content from official documents, and signage, to Web sites of the "widest possible audience of the Tribal Nations."

There are 574 federally recognized Tribal Nations. Of those, 229 are located in the state of Alaska. The other 345 Tribal Nations are spread across 35 other states.

This would, in turn deal with "more prevalent native languages", most likely the ones which are spoken more frequently.

Stats and Translation Requests

The four target languages are Yup’ik (Central dialect), Cherokee (Western dialect), Ojibwe (Western dialect), and Navajo. The contract estimates that each language will require 610 hours of translation — a somewhat uncommon way of pricing translation — for a total of 2,440 hours.

According to the American Community Survey for 2009-2013, Navajo is the most-spoken indigenous language in the US, with nearly 167,000 speakers, 35,250 of whom self-report as speaking English less than very well. The latter would be considered individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP). 

The other three languages have fewer speakers overall, and fewer individuals with LEP, including about 6,000 speakers of the Alaska Native language Yup’ik; 1,460 speakers of Cherokee; and 1,100 speakers of Ojibwe. 

With relatively small populations of people with LEP, the impetus for the RFP goes beyond numbers.

Indeed, the outgoing Biden-Harris Administration issued on December 9, 2024 a “10-year National Plan on Native Language Revitalization,” described as charting “a path to help address the United States government’s role in the loss of Native languages across the continental United States, Alaska, and Hawai’i.”

Some Tribal Nations have resources to handle (certain) translations on their own. The Cherokee Nation Translation Department, for instance, offers free translations for nonprofit uses related to education, health, and legal services. But there are limits. 

“Due to the large volume of requests, Cherokee Nation Translation does not accept unsolicited documents such as poetry, scripts, screenplays, and book manuscripts for translation,” its website states. Nor does it translate tattoos or “names in Cherokee for children, family members, [or] pets”. 

For up-to-date information about language services and technology tenders, subscribe to our Growth, Pro, or Enterprise plan and get access to the RFP Center.